The black magician: what the term meant from the Middle Ages to modern magic
Chaos Society
Acervo de estudo · magia, ocultismo e esoterismo

A term nobody ever owned
"Black magician" was never the name of a school. It is a label, and almost always a label applied by someone else. Whoever uses it says less about what the other person does and more about what they consider forbidden. So the useful question is not "what does a black magician do?" but "what did each period call black magic, and why?".
Necromancy that became nigromancy
The most concrete origin is linguistic. The Greek nekromanteia, divination through the dead, passed into Latin as necromantia. In the Middle Ages the word became tangled with niger, "black", and turned into nigromantia. The historian Richard Kieckhefer shows that in 14th- and 15th-century manuscripts nigromancy no longer meant speaking with the dead: it meant ritual magic for conjuring demons, practised above all by clerics who knew Latin.
That is how the colour entered the story. The "black art" was the art of circles, divine names and spirits compelled to obey. It was also the gravest accusation a court could make, because it implied a pact, explicit or not, with the enemy of God.
Lévi and the morality of the will
In the 19th century, Éliphas Lévi gave the term a moral meaning that lasts to this day. In Dogma and Ritual of High Magic (1854–1856), the same force, the astral light moved by the will, can serve balance or perversion. The black magician, for Lévi, is the one who lets himself be possessed by that force instead of directing it: he uses imagination to dominate, bewitch and corrupt, and ends up the slave of what he invokes.
This reading matters because it changes the criterion. It is no longer the technique that defines the colour of magic, but the intention and state of the operator. An evocation can be "white" or "black" depending on its purpose.
Brothers of the Shadow and Black Brothers
Helena Blavatsky's Theosophy popularised in the West the terms right-hand path and left-hand path, adapted from Indian tantra, and spoke of "Brothers of the Shadow", adepts who develop powers for selfish ends. Blavatsky even used the name of a Tibetan Buddhist lineage, the Drukpa, as a synonym for sorcerers, something now recognised as error and prejudice.
Aleister Crowley went further and was more technical. In texts such as One Star in Sight and The Vision and the Voice, the "Black Brother" is the adept who reaches the Abyss, the boundary between the personal self and what lies beyond, and refuses to cross it. He shuts himself in a tower of ego, accumulating power and knowledge, but never surrenders. For Crowley, black magic is not invoking demons: it is refusing transformation.
Dion Fortune, in Psychic Self-Defence (1930), took up the idea as a warning: lodges that manipulate people, psychic attacks and the use of occultism to control others. The book mixes personal cases and doctrine, and shows how the "black magician" became a cautionary figure within the orders themselves.
Grimoires, pacts and reputation
Part of the reputation comes from the books themselves. Grimoires such as the Grimorium Verum and the Grand Grimoire, printed in cheap editions in the 18th and 19th centuries, promised pacts, treasure and power over other people. Owen Davies shows that this publishing market fed the image of the dangerous sorcerer more than any real practice did. See how that material treats the figure of Lucifer in Lucifer in the grimoires.
The term in the Americas
In Brazil and across much of the Americas, "black magic" had another use, and a violent one. For much of the 20th century the Brazilian press and police used it for Umbanda, Quimbanda and Candomblé. Terreiros were raided and sacred objects seized under the 1890 Penal Code, which punished "spiritism" and "magic and its spells". Something similar happened to Santería in the Caribbean and to Vodou in Haiti and the United States. The adjective carried a moral judgement and a racial one at the same time.
Anyone who studies occultism seriously needs to know this history. Calling an entire tradition black magic does not describe what that tradition does. To understand exus and pombagiras without that filter, read Pombagira in Umbanda.
How to use the term with judgement
- Ask who is speaking. In most sources, "black magician" is an accusation, not a self-description.
- Separate technique from intention. Since Lévi, the same operation can be read in opposite ways.
- Do not confuse it with the left-hand path. The left-hand path is a philosophical proposal with its own authors and practices; see white and black magic.
- Be suspicious of the colour. The association between black and evil has a history, and it is not neutral.
In short
The black magician has been, in turn, the nigromancer cleric, the operator who perverts the will, the selfish adept of Theosophy, the Black Brother who refuses the Abyss and the label thrown at Afro-diasporic religions. In every version, the figure serves to draw a moral boundary. Knowing where each author drew that line is what lets you study the subject without repeating the prejudice.
Sources and further reading
- Richard Kieckhefer, Magic in the Middle Ages (1989)
- Éliphas Lévi, Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie (1854–1856)
- H. P. Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled (1877)
- Aleister Crowley, One Star in Sight and The Vision and the Voice
- Dion Fortune, Psychic Self-Defence (1930)
- Owen Davies, Grimoires: A History of Magic Books (2009)
Reviewed by the Chaos Society editorial team in November 2026.
Frequently asked questions
What is a black magician?
It depends on the period. In the Middle Ages it was someone who practised nigromancy, the conjuring of spirits. For Lévi, someone who uses the will to dominate and corrupt. For Crowley, the adept who refuses to dissolve the ego. It is not a school or an organised tradition.
Is black magic the same as the left-hand path?
No. The left-hand path comes from tantra (vamachara) and was reinterpreted in the West as a path of self-deification. Black magic is a moral label applied by others, almost never a self-description.
Why is the term criticised?
Because for decades it was used to criminalise Afro-diasporic religions such as Umbanda, Quimbanda, Candomblé, Santería and Vodou, associating them with evil. Knowing the history of the term helps separate morality, prejudice and practice.





